Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki

A friendly reminder regarding spoilers! At present the expanded Trek universe is in a period of major upheaval with the finale of Picard and the continuations of Discovery, Lower Decks, Prodigy and Strange New Worlds, the advent of new eras in Star Trek Online gaming, as well as other post-56th Anniversary publications such as the new ongoing IDW comic. Therefore, please be courteous to other users who may not be aware of current developments by using the {{spoiler}}, {{spoilers}} or {{majorspoiler}} tags when adding new information from sources less than six months old. Also, please do not include details in the summary bar when editing pages and do not anticipate making additions relating to sources not yet in release. 'Thank You

READ MORE

Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki
Register
Advertisement

Shouldn't we have an unnamed holograms page for this? - DS9 Forever (talk) 18:33, October 10, 2016 (UTC)

He wasn't a hologram. -- Captain MKB 10:06, October 13, 2016 (UTC)
In a further explanation, unnamed characters pages don't seem to be flourishing. Certain types of unnamed characters can and have been given their own pages, and it is important to note the conditions in order to make sure our efforts make sense. For example, the Keeper and the Female Changeling have always been regarded as separate articles because of the relative importance of the characters.
I fully understand why, for example, "unnamed USS Enterprise-D operations managers" might need to be gang-collected onto an unnamed biography page -- there are dozens of them. But the Royale bellboy is a unique character with a short biography that is ideal for a separate page, rather than languishing untended on the larger illusory Humans page. If you had looked at that page, you could have seen the answer to your question. groups of characters maintained on the unnamed character biography page, unique characters have a separate approach. -- Captain MKB 13:42, November 27, 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement