where should we put the info about the comic version? -- Captain M.K.B. 02:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit?Edit

Explain how this is correct English, or even a cohesive thought:

"This Game explain many things why Chang likes William Shakespeare and why he was part of the conspiracy. It also explains why the explosion of Praxis was devastating to the Klingons and it shows how Gorkon became Chancellor. " – AT2Howell 19:54, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

You shouldn't be removing information on account of bad grammar. You should correct the grammar. It's called working with your peers rather than against them. -- Captain MKB 20:11, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit? p2Edit

"Four-hundred years ago on the planet Earth, workers who felt their livelihood threatened by automation flung their wooden shoes, called 'sabot', into the machines to stop them." – AT2Howell 19:55, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

I didn't remove anything about wooden shoes. I've gone ahead protected the article until you can calm down and make more carefully considered accusations, if indeed that's what this statement is. -- Captain MKB 20:16, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

You removed it when you reverted the edits. I just couldn't belive you would forget that line. You were throwing the 'revert' axe around kinda wild. – AT2Howell 20:17, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

If you look at the article history you can plainly see what was reverted and there were no statements about "workers' livelihoods" removed so again, I'll wait for you to cool off and start making rational statements, as it wouldn' matter whether or not i remembered that line. And I wouldn't have to revert at all if users would be more careful about swinging their "randomly removing information" axes, wouldn't I? -- MKB

Yes, I'll grant that I could have completely re-written that mess of a paragraph. Instead I edited it down to a teaser. My bad. Now then, when you go blindly reverting with the grace of a bull in a china shop, I will have to call you on it. Instead of you rewriting the teaser to include the info I removed, you reverted to a version, removing my teaser AND references that were added at the same time. Your bad. See, we were both in the 'bad'. On the other hand, it is good to see you're still quick on the trigger when it comes to editing. – AT2Howell 21:24, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

"Oops" "My bad" "I removed a single link to "sabot" by accident while correcting damage you did to an article" "So sorry" Are we better now? Like I said, stop abusing the articles by deleting info, and I won't have to take drastic measures everytime you decide to damage something here. -- Captain MKB 22:15, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it's all good now. – AT2Howell 13:25, September 9, 2010 (UTC)